The decision was made by FIFA last autumn that playoff fixtures from the European qualifying groups should be organized with reference to seedings. This meant that the higher ranked teams would play lower ranked teams, thus providing a gentle helping hand to the more established footballing nations. It may have appeared that this decision was taken for commercial reasons, as significant nations such as Portugal and France had failed to acquire automatic qualification. Those with a grasp of ethics may have thought that, as teams had been presented with the same qualification task in principle, teams that had made the playoffs should have been dealt with equally via a random draw.
However, FIFA have decided that this seeding process was a viable initiative and are allegedly considering rolling out this approach so that it applies throughout the forthcoming World Cup. WCC spoke to FIFA’s Ideas Clerk, Wolf Zwick, to obtain some more information*:
“The problem with football is, of course, that sometimes results are wrong. We are all aware of occasions when talented teams from big nations have tragically lost to sides from less celebrated nations. Remember the horror of Greece winning Euro 2004? Pan-national football associations require big names from the big nations to excel at tournaments so that the media can jump up and down in excitement at the likes of Ronaldo, Henry, Kaka and Wilkshire. Teams sans big name players, which win tournaments by adopting a holistic defensive approach, don’t lend themselves particularly well to economic stimulation. Football may be a team game but it is individuals that sell products.
“Therefore at this forthcoming World Cup in South Africa, teams will progress according to seedings rather than results. Football is big business in the era of global commerce, so it’s too great a risk to leave the tournament at the mercy of what happens on the pitch. Matches will still be played of course, but the action will be fairly meaningless as the winners and losers will have been pre-established by rankings conferred by a FIFA committee.
“We do understand that fans may become disenchanted if there is a substantial disparity between results and seedings. For example, if a top nation is trounced in all of its group stage games, but still progresses to the second round, then this could seem a little unfair. To prevent this from happening, we are providing some additional help to the top nations: on each occasion an unseeded team scores, this smaller nation will be granted one goal as per the old rules, but now the seeded team will also be allocated three goals. We don’t want to skew things too much in the favour of the seeded sides though, so when they score a goal of their own it will still only count as one goal. We believe that this will provide everyone with just what they want: the top nations winning high scoring games. Just think, in previous tournaments a 3-2 victory for Honduras over Brazil would have remained 3-2; in 2010 it will be an 11-3 victory for Brazil!
“We hope you all enjoy what is going to be the greatest sporting show ever. And yes, the final will be between Brazil and Spain.”
* WCC has not contacted anyone. If FIFA do have an Ideas Clerk called Wolf Zwick, this is entirely coincidental.
This reminds me of an article I read about a football management game for the PC (not Championship Manager.)
In an interview with a journalist, the head developer claimed it was the most realistic managment sim ever and had been specifically programmed to prevent ‘lesser’ teams ‘impossibly’ winning European silverware.
When asked would it be possible for say, Aberdeen to win a European trophy, the developer was quick to say that this could never happen in real life and so the software code would prevent it from occuring in the game…
When will FIFA realise that ‘star players’ should not have to suffer the inidignity of opponents challenging them for the ball? Surely this simple amendment to the Laws of the Game would lead to a more pleasing spectacle and some great goals.
Absolutely Isambard. I remember many a game of park football that was interrupted by a thoroughly refreshed fellow who insisted that we stop our game and provide him with cross after cross, so as he could eventually show us his volleying prowess. We didn’t have any spectators, but if we did, I think I know what they would have preferred to see.
This rule cannot come into force soon enough. How much longer will real football fans have to put up with wrong results like little teams from Germany beating our brave boys?