What if?

When England failed to qualify for Euro 2008 there was much debate about the seemingly terminal decline of English football. What role can history play in helping us to understand the apparent malaise which gripped the English game circa 2008?

A historian referring to the broad sweep of cultural process may have analyzed the features of the English psyche that seem to favour effort in sport over technical expertise. English football has traditionally been predicated on hard work and high energy, with technical skills considered softer parts of the game. England’s culture had thus meant that football had stagnated whilst other nations advanced technically, and the qualification campaign for 2008 brought this starkly to our attention.

A more institutionally-minded historian would look less at the overarching culture of society focus and more on administrative infrastructure. The need for better coaching in schools and at grassroots level is a factor that would facilitate bottom-up advancement throughout the game. The influx of foreign talent at professional clubs would also be argued to have limited the scope for homegrown players to establish themselves. Root and branch changes were thus required to mend an organizational structure which had ultimately been unable to support the national team’s qualifying campaign.

Whilst there may be elements of truth to these broad historical perspectives, the counterfactual historian warns against a reverse-engineered view of history as an inevitable sequence of events and asks instead what if?

A 2-2 draw against Croatia advances England to Euro 2008

A 2-2 draw against Croatia advances England to Euro 2008

For example, with regard to the Euro 2008 qualifiers, what if Steven Gerrard hadn’t missed from close range in the 50th minute against Russia in Moscow? And what if Mladen Petric hadn‚Äôt scored a thunderbolt for Croatia late in the final qualifying game at Wembley? The answer in both cases is that England would probably have qualified for the tournament – from a very competitive group. Such a fine margin of failure is perhaps an insufficient indicator of deep cultural or structural malaise. Contingency and luck did impact upon what were, admittedly, Steve McClaren’s flawed endeavours to guide England to the Euros. Those arguing for root and branch change to our sporting fabric should perhaps also have noted the success of English clubs in the Champions League around this period.

One successful World Cup qualification campaign later and the monolithic theories decrying [select any of the following] a declining national culture; poor coaching in schools; overpaid players lacking moral fibre; too many foreign players in the Premier League; the cold climate preventing practice of technical skills etc – have suddenly dwindled. But perhaps the same counterfactual historical stance should be applied to England’s success in this instance. What if, during the early qualifier in Zagreb, Croatia’s Robert Kovac had only received a yellow card for his challenge on Joe Cole?

This entry was posted in Social Sciences. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to What if?

  1. The Sound of Shoelaces says:

    If ifs and buts were pots and pans, there’d be no need for tinker’s hands.
    Thought for us all there.

  2. Shaken not stirred says:

    If thats food for thought, whos going to do the washing up????

    Think about it.

  3. Shaken not stirred says:

    Seroiusly though, this article sheds some light on the precarious nature of international football. I’ve always maintained its difficult for international managers and players to mould into a team based on 6 or 7 games a year. Even the ever presents above have only played 8 competitive games in 2 years leading up to a world cup.

    Theres a well known football cliche that the best team always wins the league, but this isnt always the case in cups. Flashes of inspiration, referring decisions and slices of luck can make the difference. (Portsmouth knocking out Man Utd on route to 2008 FA Cup final as an example that springs to mind)

    I guess what I’m proposing is an international league – with home and away* ties as the only true indication of how national teams compare. Obviously in practical terms it would be a logistical nightmare, spanning numerous seasons due to an already congested fixture list.

    I think until this is the case we have to accept that international tournaments and cup competitions should be enjoyed as a guilty pleasure – an unpredictable and exciting side dish to the bread and butter of the league campaign. (Sorry about the culinary metaphor I know it doesn’t exactly make sense but I’ve haven’t had dinner yet and im starting to get peckish)

    *With the exception of 1958, every world cup held in Europe has been won by a European national, and every world cup held elsewhere has been won by a South American nation.

  4. Isambard Milutinovic says:

    How would the world of international football look today if Beckham hadn’t flicked his leg out at Simeone in World Cup 1998?